|
General Information
|
| Region |
Place ID |
Place Name |
Place Type |
Place Address |
Place County |
| 3 |
S824037 |
Phase II Small MS4 |
Facility |
- Santa Barbara, CA, - |
Santa Barbara |
|
|
Related Parties
|
|
|
Total Related Parties: 1
|
|
|
Regulatory Measures
|
|
|
Total Reg Measures: 1
|
|
|
Violations
|
| Violation ID |
Occurred Date |
Violation Type |
(-) Violation Description |
Corrective Action |
Status |
Classification |
Source |
| S877992 |
11/05/2021 |
Deficient BMP Implementation |
Violation of General Permit provision E.12.k for failure to comply with PCRs section D requiring the County to “field verify that the Site Design, Water Quality Treatment, Runoff Retention, and/or Peak Management Controls have been implemented in accordance with these PCRs.” |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
| S877988 |
04/15/2021 |
Deficient BMP Implementation |
Violation of General Permit provision E.12.k for failure to comply with Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 (Central Coast Post-Construction Requirements) sections E.3.g and E.3.h. |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
| S877990 |
04/15/2021 |
Deficient BMP Implementation |
Violation of General Permit provision E.12.k for failure to comply with Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 (PCRs) section B.2.a, B.3.a, and B.5.a. |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
| S877991 |
04/15/2021 |
Deficient BMP Implementation |
Violation of General Permit provision E.12.k for failure to comply with Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 (PCRs) sections B.3.c, B.4.g, and B.5.b. This is a violation because the County approved the two SWCPs containing non-compliance issues with the PCRs:
Vintage Ranch Development,
and Mattei's Tavern. |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
|
Report displays most recent five years of violations. Refer to the Interactive Violation Report for more data.
|
|
|
Total Violations: 4
|
Priority Violations: 0
|
*Click the "(+/-) Violation Description" link to expand and contract the violation description.
*As of 5/20/2010, the Water Board's Enforcement Policy requires that all violations be classified as 1, 2 or 3, with class 1 being the highest. Prior to this, violations were simply classified as Yes or No. If a 123 classification has been assigned to a violation that occurred before this date, that classification data will be displayed instead of the Yes/No data.
|
| Violation Types |
|
Deficient BMP Implementation = Deficient BMP Implementation
|
|
|
|
Enforcement Actions
|
| Enf Id |
Enf Type |
Enf Order No. |
Effective Date |
Status |
| S441885 |
Notice of Violation |
|
11/05/2021 |
Historical |
| S433328 |
Notice of Violation |
|
04/03/2019 |
Historical |
| S426200 |
Notice of Violation |
|
06/01/2017 |
Historical |
| S412608 |
Staff Enforcement Letter |
|
08/09/2013 |
Historical |
|
|
Total Enf Actions: 4
|
|
|
Inspections
|
|
| Total Inspections: 4 |
Last Inspection: 03/23/2022 |
|