Welcome to California
 California Home
Welcome to California - images of Golden Gate Bridge, ocean sunset, waterfall, flowers, and city skyline California Home Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
 California Integrated Water Quality System Project (CIWQS)
   Facility At-A-Glance Report

  
   [VIEW PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION] [EXPORT THIS REPORT TO EXCEL]

  
   SEARCH CRITERIA:      [REFINE SEARCH] [NEW SEARCH] [GLOSSARY]
Place ID 257831
  
  
  
  
Hide All Show All
General Information
Region Place ID Place Name Place Type Place Address Place County
9 257831 South Bay WRP Wastewater Treatment Facility 2411 Dairy Mart San Diego, CA, 92154 San Diego

Expand/Contract Related Parties
Related Parties
Party Party Type Party Name Role Classification Relationship Start Date Relationship End Date
642787 Person Alejandra Molloy Is A Data Submitter For 12/23/2024
149695 Person Joann Lim Case Worker 09/01/2024
643148 Person Arielle Beaulieu Is A Data Submitter For 12/22/2023
593788 Person Michael Neil Rosenberg Is Onsite Manager For 12/13/2023
642132 Person Alyssa Gonzales Is A Data Submitter For 10/12/2023
641869 Person Maria Noller Is A Data Submitter For 09/28/2023 12/23/2024
641797 Person Eric Brunson Is A Data Submitter For 09/26/2023 12/23/2024
593788 Person Michael Neil Rosenberg Is A Data Submitter For 09/25/2023
640981 Person Brenda Dowell Is A Data Submitter For 08/08/2023
569565 Person Rachel Davenport Contact 11/16/2017
543703 Person Alex Cali Case Worker 11/16/2017 03/07/2019
554587 Person Elvira Mercado Is A Data Submitter For 02/10/2016 10/12/2023
547282 Person Peter S Vroom Is Onsite Manager For 08/01/2014
543757 Person Robert J. Mulvey Is Onsite Manager For 11/07/2013 10/25/2016
538782 Person Cheryl Lester Is Onsite Manager For 03/06/2013 08/31/2018
90922 Person Ann Sasaki Is Onsite Manager For 10/07/2011 12/01/2014
139178 Person Ben Neill Case Worker 08/02/2011 01/01/2012
526050 Person Steve Meyer Is Onsite Manager For 04/29/2011 12/01/2014
525937 Person Brent Bowman Is A Data Submitter For 02/18/2011 12/23/2024
525416 Person Jay Goldstone Is Onsite Manager For 12/22/2010
149695 Person Joann Lim Case Worker 05/25/2010 11/16/2017
145395 Person Alice Benson Contact 06/17/2005 08/01/2009
8709 Organization San Diego City Metropolitan Wastewater Dept (Public Utilities) Owner and Operator City Agency 11/18/1999
Total Related Parties: 23

Expand/Contract Regulatory Measures
Regulatory Measures
Reg Measure ID Reg Measure Type Region Program Order No. WDID Effective Date Expiration Date Status Amended?
437319 NPDES Permit 9 NPDMUNILRG R9-2021-0011 9 000000900 07/01/2021 06/30/2026 Active N
442189 WDR 9 WDRMUNILRG R9-2021-0015 9 000000913 06/09/2021 06/09/2036 Active N
440391 Co-Permitee SB SLIC 2020-0015-DWQ 9 000000900 07/09/2020 Active N
438847 Enrollee - Waiver 9 WDRMUNILRG R9-2019-0005W2 06/30/2020 05/08/2024 Historical N
405321 Letter 9 WDRMUNILRG 10/05/2015 Historical N
388394 NPDES Permit 9 NPDMUNILRG R9-2013-0006 9 000000900 04/04/2013 04/03/2018 Historical Y
317515 NPDES Permit 9 NPDMUNILRG R9-2006-0067 9 000000900 01/01/2007 01/01/2012 Historical N
148190 WDR 9 WDRMUNILRG R9-2000-0203 9 000000913 11/08/2000 11/08/2013 Historical Y
148766 NPDES Permit 9 NPDMUNILRG R9-2000-0129add1 9 000000900 09/23/2000 09/23/2005 Historical Y
Total Reg Measures: 9

Expand/Contract Violations
Violations
Violation ID Occurred Date Violation Type (-) Violation Description Corrective Action Status Classification Source
1139567 12/31/2024 DMON During the monitoring period of December 1-2, 2024, the laboratory failed to follow the SOP (Document ID: 1467, BOD_WW_SED_SLDS revision 10, Section 8, Reagents and Standards) and used the incorrect type of Polyseed for the BOD analysis resulting in values which reflect Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) instead of BOD. When the error was discovered (12/4/24), CAR 23078 was issued to properly monitor and avoid deficiency reoccurrence, and the laboratory immediately began using the correct type of BOD Polyseed. Additionally, a comparison study was performed on 12/06/24 to determine the possible impact of the results from using Polyseed (BOD) vs. PolyseedNX (CBOD) during the monitoring period for the Outfall and Reclaimed water sources. The comparative study results (Reference Batch ID 24341BOD41) demonstrated the data was not significantly impacted for Outfall. Violation U eSMR
1138565 11/30/2024 DMON During the monitoring period of November 1-30, 2024, the laboratory failed to follow the SOP (Document ID: 1467, BOD_WW_SED_SLDS revision 10, Section 8, Reagents and Standards) and used the incorrect type of Polyseed for the BOD analysis resulting in values which reflect Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) instead of BOD. The affected sources include SB Outfall and Reclaimed water. All the data pertinent to the mentioned period successfully passed all QC criteria. When the error was discovered (12/4/24), CAR 23078 was issued to properly monitor and avoid deficiency reoccurrence, and the laboratory immediately began using the correct type of BOD Polyseed. Additionally, a comparison study was performed on 12/06/24 to determine the possible impact of the results from using Polyseed (BOD) vs. PolyseedNX (CBOD) during the monitoring period for the Outfall and Reclaimed water sources. The comparative study results (Reference Batch ID 24341BOD41) demonstrated the data was not significantly impacted for Outfall and Reclaimed water sources from November 1-30, 2024. Violation U eSMR
1138568 10/31/2024 DMON During the monitoring period of October 1-31, 2024, the laboratory failed to follow the SOP (Document ID: 1467, BOD_WW_SED_SLDS revision 10, Section 8, Reagents and Standards) and used the incorrect type of Polyseed for the BOD analysis resulting in values which reflect Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) instead of BOD. The affected sources include SB Outfall and Reclaimed water. All the data pertinent to the mentioned period successfully passed all QC criteria. When the error was discovered (12/4/24), CAR 23078 was issued to properly monitor and avoid deficiency reoccurrence, and the laboratory immediately began using the correct type of BOD Polyseed. Additionally, a comparison study was performed on 12/06/24 to determine the possible impact of the results from using Polyseed (BOD) vs. PolyseedNX (CBOD) during the monitoring period for the Outfall and Reclaimed water sources. The comparative study results (Reference Batch ID 24341BOD41) demonstrated the data was not significantly impacted for Outfall and Reclaimed water sources from October 1-31, 2024. Violation U eSMR
1135095 09/30/2024 DMON 1. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of Influent sample, collected on 9/8/24, the pH meter used was not calibrated. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed when the failure become known. 2. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of Influent sample, collected on 9/21/24, the batch internal check recovery was outside method acceptance criteria. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed after the 5-day incubation period when results become known. 3. For the pH analysis of Influent collected on 9/9/24 the pH meter used was not calibrated. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of pH testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed when the failure become known. 1. Influent BOD analysis: The analyst was made aware of the error and an instruction was issued to double check that the pH meter is calibrated prior to using it. 2. Influent BOD analysis: The correct volume of inoculum is still being evaluated. A Corrective Action Request from the previous month is still in the process of being implemented. 3. Influent pH analysis: The analyst was made aware of the error and an instruction was issued to double check that the pH meter is calibrated prior to using it. Violation U eSMR
1135096 09/30/2024 DMON 1. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of the Outfall sample, collected on 9/8/24, the pH meter used was not calibrated. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed when the failure become known. 2. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of the Outfall sample, collected on 9/21/24, the batch internal check recovery was outside method acceptance criteria. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed after the 5-day incubation period when results become known. 3. For the pH analysis of Outfall sample collected on 9/9/24 the pH meter used was not calibrated. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of pH testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed when the failure become known. 1. Outfall BOD analysis: The analyst was made aware of the error and an instruction was issued to double check that the pH meter is calibrated prior to using it. 2. Outfall BOD analysis: The correct volume of inoculum is still being evaluated. A Corrective Action Request from the previous month is still in the process of being implemented. 3. Outfall pH analysis: The analyst was made aware of the error and an instruction was issued to double check that the pH meter is calibrated prior to using it. Violation U eSMR
1138567 09/30/2024 DMON During the monitoring period of September 1-30, 2024, the laboratory failed to follow the SOP (Document ID: 1467, BOD_WW_SED_SLDS revision 10, Section 8, Reagents and Standards) and used the incorrect type of Polyseed for the BOD analysis resulting in values which reflect Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) instead of BOD. The affected sources include SB Outfall and Reclaimed water. All the data pertinent to the mentioned period successfully passed all QC criteria. When the error was discovered (12/4/24), CAR 23078 was issued to properly monitor and avoid deficiency reoccurrence, and the laboratory immediately began using the correct type of BOD Polyseed. Additionally, a comparison study was performed on 12/06/24 to determine the possible impact of the results from using Polyseed (BOD) vs. PolyseedNX (CBOD) during the monitoring period for the Outfall and Reclaimed water sources. The comparative study results (Reference Batch ID 24341BOD41) demonstrated the data was not significantly impacted for Outfall and Reclaimed water sources from September 1-30, 2024. Violation U eSMR
1132923 08/31/2024 DMON 1. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of Effluent samples, collected on 8/19/24 and 8/20/24, the batch internal check recovery was outside method acceptance criteria. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed after the 5-day incubation period when results become known. 2. TCDD Equivalents: The outsourced analysis (Dioxins) for South Bay effluent (sampled 8/6/24) laboratory report revealed the analytical batch internal check recovery for 2,3,7,8 TCDF was non-detect and the analyte was deemed non-reportable. 1. Effluent BOD: A Corrective Action Request was initiated. A review of the manufacturer¿s polyseed (inoculum) preparation was performed and an updated preparation procedure has been implemented. Additionally, the volume used to inoculate the internal check has been reviewed and determined that an increase in volume will provide more effective results. 2. TCDD Equivalents: For the Effluent, the quarterly requirement was met with the July Dioxins analysis without QC failure. Once the permit frequency is met, the City will refrain from sending additional monthly samples for analysis. The City will work with the external laboratory in order to be notified of QC failures immediately in an effort to be able to re-sample and re-analyze to fulfill the quarterly requirement with acceptable QC. Violation U eSMR
1132925 08/31/2024 DMON 1. For the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) analysis of Influent samples, collected on 8/19/24 and 8/20/24, the batch internal check recovery was outside method acceptance criteria. The analytical batch was deemed non-reportable. Due to the nature of BOD testing, the sample could not be reanalyzed after the 5-day incubation period when results become known. 2. TCDD Equivalents: The outsourced analysis (Dioxins) for South Bay Influent (sampled 8/6/24) laboratory report revealed the analytical batch internal check recovery for 2,3,7,8 TCDF was non-detect and the analyte was deemed non-reportable. 1. Influent BOD: A Corrective Action Request was initiated. A review of the manufacturer's polyseed (inoculum) preparation was performed and an updated preparation procedure has been implemented. Additionally, the volume used to inoculate the internal check has been reviewed and determined that an increase in volume will provide more effective results. 2. TCDD Equivalents: For the Influent, there is no permit requirement to analyze for Dioxins, therefore the City will re-examine its sampling and outsourcing policy to refrain from sending unrequired samples out for analysis in the future. Violation U eSMR
1138566 08/31/2024 DMON During the monitoring period of August 27 - 31, 2024, the laboratory failed to follow the SOP (Document ID: 1467, BOD_WW_SED_SLDS revision 10, Section 8, Reagents and Standards) and used the incorrect type of Polyseed for the BOD analysis resulting in values which reflect Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) instead of BOD. The affected sources include SB Outfall and Reclaimed water. All the data pertinent to the mentioned period successfully passed all QC criteria. When the error was discovered (12/4/24), CAR 23078 was issued to properly monitor and avoid deficiency reoccurrence, and the laboratory immediately began using the correct type of BOD Polyseed. Additionally, a comparison study was performed on 12/06/24 to determine the possible impact of the results from using Polyseed (BOD) vs. PolyseedNX (CBOD) during the monitoring period for the Outfall and Reclaimed water sources. The comparative study results (Reference Batch ID 24341BOD41) demonstrated the data was not significantly impacted for Outfall and Reclaimed water sources from August 27 - 31, 2024. Violation U eSMR
1132924 08/31/2024 DMON The following effluent pH monitoring requirement was not met: ¿The minimum sampling frequency shall be five days per week and shall increase to seven days per week for at least one week during July or August of each year¿. The City only analyzed SB Outfall six of the required seven days during any single week in July and August. A Corrective Action Request was initiated (ID#22336). Training will be provided for laboratory personnel to review permit requirements, and the supervisor scheduled a reminder in Outlook for the July-August 2025 period. Violation U eSMR
1123528 10/06/2023 DMON Tributyl tin quarterly analysis requires the analysis of a 24 hour composite sample from SB_OUTFALL (monitoring location E-001), however a grab sample was inadvertently analyzed instead. An internal Corrective Action Request (CAR) was initiated to address the laboratory error. The supervisor held a training session to re-educate staff on the differences between Grab and 24-hour Composite sample types and when/how the NPDES permits require Grab or Composite samples for the analyses performed. Violation U eSMR
1111625 11/30/2022 DMON There is deficient monitoring due to the unavailability of the November monthly effluent radioactivity results for this month's reporting. The November monthly effluent sample for radioactivity analysis was collected per the permit-prescribed sampling frequency and was promptly outsourced to an external laboratory; however, the external laboratory report has not been received by the City in-house laboratory to date. Per the external laboratory, results will be sent as soon as possible; unfortunately, data will not meet the reporting deadline. The monitoring result for radioactivity analysis will be reported in CIWQS as soon as the external lab report is received. The City of San Diego in-house laboratory has started to look into outsourcing permit-required radiation samples to other external laboratories. Per the external laboratory, it has been difficult to get the gas required to count radiochemistry samples due to continually challenging supply issues. Additionally, the matrix of the City samples, plus our specific and additional MS/MSD requirements, require extremely long counting times. To compound matters, the external laboratory is one Beta instrument down and the replacement will take another six months to arrive. Violation U eSMR
1109809 10/23/2022 LREP Once Only OneTime ( TECHRPT ) (Coastal Remote Sensing Study Recommendations Report) report for 2021/07/01 (2489180) was due on 22-OCT-22 Violation B Report
1109708 09/30/2022 DMON There is deficient monitoring due to the unavailability of the September monthly effluent radioactivity results for this month. The September monthly effluent sample for radioactivity analysis was collected per the permit-prescribed sampling frequency and was promptly outsourced to an external laboratory; however, the external laboratory report has not been received by the City in-house laboratory to date. Per the external laboratory, results will be sent as soon as possible; unfortunately, data will not meet the reporting deadline. The monitoring result for radioactivity analysis will be reported in CIWQS as soon as the external lab report is received. Violation B eSMR
1110836 08/31/2022 Deficient Reporting Radioactivity monitoring results were not included in the August 2022 monthly monitoring report. A revised August 2022 monthly monitoring report will be submitted by the City. Violation B Report
1109547 07/31/2022 Deficient Reporting Effluent radioactivity results were not included in the July 2022 monthly monitoring report because they were analyzed late by the City's contract lab. A revised July 2022 monthly monitoring report will be submitted by the City. Violation B Report
1098934 12/29/2021 LREP Once Only OneTime ( PRETRPT ) (Local Limits Technical Evaluation) report for 2021/07/01 (2482809) was due on 28-DEC-21 Violation B Report
1092700 06/29/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092703 06/29/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.2 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092699 06/22/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092701 06/22/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092698 06/15/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.3 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092694 06/15/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092697 06/08/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092696 06/08/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092702 06/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1092695 06/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.8 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. A contractor has been selected for the project and it's currently at the design phase. Violation U eSMR
1091498 05/25/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.3 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the   approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1091500 05/25/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the   approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1091499 05/18/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.3 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the   approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1091501 05/04/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.1 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the   approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1091497 05/04/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090665 04/27/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090666 04/27/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.1 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090664 04/20/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.8 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090662 04/13/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090667 04/06/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1090663 04/06/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.8 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years' data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089575 03/29/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089576 03/29/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089583 03/23/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089580 03/23/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.3 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089582 03/16/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089584 03/16/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.2 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089581 03/09/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089579 03/09/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089577 03/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1089578 03/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.7 %. The plant will strive to meet the goal of running both EDRs at all times while also working on the approved replacement project for the EDRs with Reverse Osmosis (RO) units. Additionally, according to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Table 3-1: Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality for Irrigation, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) calculations based on the last two years¿ data indicate conformance with the recycled water quality standards for slight or moderate use for irrigation. Violation U eSMR
1088176 02/23/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088177 02/23/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.5 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088173 02/16/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088172 02/16/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.3 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088179 02/09/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088175 02/09/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088178 02/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088174 02/02/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.6 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086905 01/26/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086909 01/26/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.5 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086912 01/19/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086906 01/19/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.3 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086911 01/12/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086908 01/12/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.3 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086910 01/05/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1086907 01/05/2021 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085185 12/28/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085191 12/28/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085187 12/21/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085190 12/21/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks Violation U eSMR
1085193 12/15/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085189 12/15/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks Violation U eSMR
1085188 12/08/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085186 12/08/2020 CAT1 Sodium, Total 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.3 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085192 12/01/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1085194 12/01/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083513 11/23/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083517 11/23/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083516 11/17/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083510 11/17/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.8 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083514 11/08/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083512 11/08/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 63.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083511 11/03/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.7 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1083515 11/03/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082144 10/27/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.7 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082142 10/27/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.7 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082145 10/20/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082141 10/20/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082143 10/13/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082147 10/13/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082140 10/06/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.6 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1082146 10/06/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1090505 09/30/2020 DMON Didn't analyze for benzidine quarterly. Reported NODI H in the DMR for 001-A for the monitoring period ending on Sept. 30, 2020. Violation B Report
1080595 09/29/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080594 09/29/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080597 09/22/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.8 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080593 09/22/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 63.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080596 09/15/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080599 09/15/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1080598 09/08/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.1 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079912 08/25/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.4 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079913 08/25/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079914 08/18/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.6 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079919 08/18/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 60.5 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079917 08/11/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 63.3 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079918 08/11/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 61.9 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079915 08/04/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % 30-Day Average limit is 60 % and reported value was 63.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1079916 08/04/2020 CAT1 Sodium, % Daily Maximum limit is 60 % and reported value was 62.2 %. The laboratory continued to monitor the cations Na, K, Ca, and Mg in recycled water produced by the plant via weekly sample collection and analysis and will continue to do so until compliance with tertiary treated effluent limitations is achieved for two consecutive weeks. Violation U eSMR
1088387 05/31/2020 DMON This revised report is being submitted to address data integrity issues identified to the Board in the letter dated October 22, 2020, subject: San Diego NPDES Shoreline Sampling Program Report. As detailed in SBWRP cover letter, actions have been taken by the City to prevent this issue reoccurring in the future. Violation U eSMR
1088386 03/31/2020 DMON This revised report is being submitted to address data integrity issues identified to the Board in the letter dated October 22, 2020, subject: San Diego NPDES Shoreline Sampling Program Report. As detailed in SBWRP cover letter, actions have been taken by the City to prevent this issue reoccurring in the future. Violation U eSMR
1090507 02/29/2020 DMON Failed to sample cyanide for influent. Violation B Report
Report displays most recent five years of violations. Refer to the Interactive Violation Report for more data.
Total Violations: 109 Priority Violations: 0
*Click the "(+/-) Violation Description" link to expand and contract the violation description.
*As of 5/20/2010, the Water Board's Enforcement Policy requires that all violations be classified as 1, 2 or 3, with class 1 being the highest. Prior to this, violations were simply classified as Yes or No. If a 123 classification has been assigned to a violation that occurred before this date, that classification data will be displayed instead of the Yes/No data.

Violation Types
CAT1 = Category 1 Pollutant (Effluent Violation for Group 1 Pollutant) DMON = Deficient Monitoring
Deficient Reporting = Deficient Reporting LREP = Late Report

Expand/Contract Enforcement Actions
Enforcement Actions
Enf Id Enf Type Enf Order No. Effective Date Status
388746 Staff Enforcement Letter Historical
384933 Staff Enforcement Letter Historical
384932 Staff Enforcement Letter Historical
442868 Notice of Violation R9-2021-0043 04/09/2021 Historical
442869 13383 Letter R9-2021-0044 04/09/2021 Historical
433836 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2000-0203 09/27/2019 Historical
430012 Admin Civil Liability R9-2019-0120 07/15/2019 Historical
424748 Staff Enforcement Letter null 06/11/2019 Historical
420187 Staff Enforcement Letter 05/22/2018 Historical
418622 Staff Enforcement Letter 01/22/2018 Historical
411335 Staff Enforcement Letter null 01/18/2017 Historical
409792 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2013-0006 10/17/2016 Historical
407628 Admin Civil Liability R9-2016-0138 10/04/2016 Historical
406345 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2013-0006 06/21/2016 Historical
404894 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2013-0006 04/15/2016 Historical
402718 Staff Enforcement Letter 09/09/2015 Historical
401511 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2013-0006 07/16/2015 Historical
398967 Staff Enforcement Letter 12/01/2014 Historical
397193 Staff Enforcement Letter null 07/14/2014 Historical
396699 Staff Enforcement Letter null 06/13/2014 Historical
395740 Staff Enforcement Letter 05/13/2014 Historical
390311 Staff Enforcement Letter 05/23/2013 Historical
389491 Staff Enforcement Letter 03/05/2013 Historical
386625 Staff Enforcement Letter R9-2000-0203 07/30/2012 Historical
383722 Staff Enforcement Letter 03/13/2012 Historical
377482 Staff Enforcement Letter 02/07/2011 Historical
373926 Notice of Violation null 04/13/2010 Historical
372461 Staff Enforcement Letter 08/04/2009 Historical
372055 Notice of Violation 07/08/2009 Historical
308420 Notice of Violation R9-2006-0113 09/27/2006 Historical
305491 Notice of Violation R9-2006-0091 06/28/2006 Historical
252388 Staff Enforcement Letter 08/09/2004 Historical
247177 Staff Enforcement Letter 10/01/2003 Historical
242417 Staff Enforcement Letter 07/11/2003 Historical
246169 Staff Enforcement Letter 10/23/2002 Historical
Total Enf Actions: 35

Expand/Contract Inspections
Inspections
Inspection ID Inspection Type Lead Inspector Actual End Date Planned Violations Attachment
50879488 B Type compliance inspection Mahsa Izadmehr 01/31/2023 N 0 Download
50815501 B Type compliance inspection Olufisayo Osibodu 01/31/2023 N 0 N/A
42049772 B Type compliance inspection Olufisayo Osibodu 10/16/2020 N 0 Download
35749931 B Type compliance inspection Olufisayo Osibodu 03/22/2019 Y 0 Download
29036501 B Type compliance inspection Joann Lim 06/08/2017 N 0 Download
30777091 Preatment Audit Chuck Durham 03/22/2017 N 0 Download
21633211 Pretreatment compliance Anthony D'Angelo (Multiple) 05/20/2015 N 0 Download
20894973 B Type compliance inspection Joann Lim 01/12/2015 N 0 Download
15867687 B Type compliance inspection Alex Cali 03/27/2014 N 0 [Attachments]
9896748 B Type compliance inspection Bart Christensen (Multiple) 09/06/2012 N 0 Download
4977807 B Type compliance inspection Dan Connally 02/11/2011 N 0 [Attachments]
1847349 B Type compliance inspection Olufisayo Osibodu 09/02/2009 N 0 Download
1872930 B Type compliance inspection Danny O'Connell (Multiple) 07/13/2009 Y 0 Download
1810920 B Type compliance inspection Max Kuker (Multiple) 10/20/2008 N 0 N/A
1145815 B Type compliance inspection Dan Connally (Multiple) 03/24/2007 N 0 Download
1143404 B Type compliance inspection Danny O'Connell (Multiple) 03/16/2006 N 0 Download
1149051 B Type compliance inspection 06/06/2005 N 1 N/A
334837 B Type compliance inspection David Hanson 06/17/2004 Y 0 N/A
331799 B Type compliance inspection Bob Baker 06/05/2003 Y 0 N/A
330991 B Type compliance inspection David Hanson 05/13/2003 Y 0 N/A
311344 B Type compliance inspection David Hanson 03/27/2002 Y 0 N/A
323451 B Type compliance inspection David Hanson 03/27/2002 Y 0 N/A
Total Inspections: 22 Last Inspection: 01/31/2023
  
The current report was generated with data as of: 02/19/2025
Regional Boards are in the process of entering backlogged data.
As a result, data may be incomplete.
Back to Main Page  |  Back to Top of Page