|
General Information
|
| Region |
Place ID |
Place Name |
Place Type |
Place Address |
Place County |
| 5S |
257425 |
Sliger Mine |
Metal Mining |
Appox 1,500 feet south of the junction of Sliger Mine Road and Fox Grove Lane Greenwood, CA, 95635 |
El Dorado |
|
|
Related Parties
|
|
|
Total Related Parties: 16
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Measures
|
|
|
Total Reg Measures: 5
|
|
|
|
Violations
|
| Violation ID |
Occurred Date |
Violation Type |
(-) Violation Description |
Corrective Action |
Status |
Classification |
Source |
| 1105437 |
06/02/2022 |
LREP |
Once Only OneTime ( TECHRPT ) (MRP X.D.2 Analytical Methods Report) report for 2022/06/01 (2577848) was due on 01-JUN-22 |
|
Violation |
B |
Report |
| 1077739 |
06/02/2020 |
Order Conditions |
According to the Standard Provision I.D, ¿The Discharger shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the Discharger to achieve compliance with the conditions of this Order.¿ During the inspection, Board staff noted that the treatment system¿s inlet was clogged, and the influent water was overflowing over and around the sandbags, bypassing the treatment system. According to the Discharger, the inlet may have been clog-up due to excessive sediment buildup. The Discharger stated that the sediment buildup will be cleared soon. The bioreactor components were found in disrepair and unlikely to be operating as designed during previous inspections. Board staff did not observe any modification or improvement in the condition of the treatment system during this inspection. Not maintaining the treatment system¿s inlet and the bioreactor does not allow proper treatment of the wastewater and is a violation of the Standard Provision I.D. |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
| 1077740 |
06/02/2020 |
Order Conditions |
According to the WDRs¿ Discharge Prohibitions III.A, ¿Discharge of mining waste from the Facility, as the Facility is specifically described in the Fact Sheet in section II.B, in a manner different from that described in this Order is prohibited.¿ Even though there was no discharge to surface water at the time of the inspection, based on observations made during the inspection, effluent was being discharged in a manner different than what is described by the Order. Board staff observed effluent infiltrating and soil erosion and a narrow flow path which may have been formed from basin runoff to the surface water. |
|
Violation |
B |
Inspection |
|
Report displays most recent five years of violations. Refer to the Interactive Violation Report for more data.
|
|
|
Total Violations: 3
|
Priority Violations: 0
|
*Click the "(+/-) Violation Description" link to expand and contract the violation description.
*As of 5/20/2010, the Water Board's Enforcement Policy requires that all violations be classified as 1, 2 or 3, with class 1 being the highest. Prior to this, violations were simply classified as Yes or No. If a 123 classification has been assigned to a violation that occurred before this date, that classification data will be displayed instead of the Yes/No data.
|
| Violation Types |
|
LREP = Late Report
|
Order Conditions = Order Conditions
|
|
|
|
|
Enforcement Actions
|
|
|
Total Enf Actions: 5
|
|
|
|
Inspections
|
|
| Total Inspections: 4 |
Last Inspection: 06/02/2020 |
|
