California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS 19.5.1)


	California Home

Welcome to California - images of Golden Gate Bridge, ocean sunset, waterfall, flowers, and city skyline


	California Integrated Water Quality System Project (CIWQS)

Facility At-A-Glance Report

[VIEW PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION] [EXPORT THIS REPORT TO EXCEL]

SEARCH CRITERIA: [REFINE SEARCH] [NEW SEARCH] [GLOSSARY]
Place ID 215086

General Information
Region	Place ID	Place Name	Place Type	Place Address	Place County
5S	215086	Cold Springs Mobile Manor	Mobile Home Park	1525 Cold Springs Placerville, CA, 95667	El Dorado

Related Parties

Party	Party Type	Party Name	Role	Classification	Relationship Start Date	Relationship End Date
8997	Organization	Cold Springs Mobile Manor	Operator	Privately-Owned Business	02/20/2020
607173	Organization	Cold Springs Mobile Manor LLC	Owner	Privately-Owned Business	02/20/2020
8997	Organization	Cold Springs Mobile Manor	Owner	Privately-Owned Business	02/27/1976	02/19/2020

Total Related Parties: 3

Regulatory Measures

Reg Measure ID	Reg Measure Type	Region	Program	Order No.	WDID	Effective Date	Expiration Date	Status	Amended?
139957	WDR	5S	WDRMUNIOTH	87-214	5A091006001	12/11/1987	12/07/2002	Active	Y
140087	WDR	5S	WDR	76-016	5A091006001	02/27/1976		Historical	N

Total Reg Measures: 2

Violations

Violation ID	Occurred Date	Violation Type	(-) Violation Description	Corrective Action	Status	Classification	Source
1112185	01/09/2023	UAUTHDISC	On 9 January 2023 Board staff received an OES report (attached) filed by a third party stating that a pump was being used during the night to pump wastewater from the facility’s ponds into the creek. Board staff also received video evidence of the pump. Board staff performed a site inspection in response later that day. At the time of the inspection Board staff observed the pump located on the berm of the treatment ponds adjacent to the creek. The intake hose was in Pond 2 and the discharge hose was in Pond 1. However, there was evidence that the discharge hose had been laying on the grass between the pump and the creek, and cinder blocks to hold the end of the hose were in the creek bed consistent with the photos provided in the complaint (see attached photo log). The onsite managers stated that El Dorado County Environmental Health (County) had been to the Facility earlier that day. They said at that time the pump’s intake hose had been in Pond 2 and the discharge hose had been running down the side of the berm into the creek. The County had asked that the discharge hose be removed from the creek, and the onsite managers had complied. Based on the video evidence provided to Board staff, the onsite manager’s statement, and Board staff’s observations, the pump has caused or threatens to cause a violation of the following WDR requirements: Discharge Prohibition A.1: “The direct discharge of wastes to surface waters or surface water drainage courses is prohibited.”		Violation	B	Complaint
1112186	01/09/2023	UAUTHDISC	On 9 January 2023 Board staff received an OES report (attached) filed by a third party stating that a pump was being used during the night to pump wastewater from the facility’s ponds into the creek. Board staff also received video evidence of the pump. Board staff performed a site inspection in response later that day. At the time of the inspection Board staff observed the pump located on the berm of the treatment ponds adjacent to the creek. The intake hose was in Pond 2 and the discharge hose was in Pond 1. However, there was evidence that the discharge hose had been laying on the grass between the pump and the creek, and cinder blocks to hold the end of the hose were in the creek bed consistent with the photos provided in the complaint (see attached photo log). The onsite managers stated that El Dorado County Environmental Health (County) had been to the Facility earlier that day. They said at that time the pump’s intake hose had been in Pond 2 and the discharge hose had been running down the side of the berm into the creek. The County had asked that the discharge hose be removed from the creek, and the onsite managers had complied. Based on the video evidence provided to Board staff, the onsite manager’s statement, and Board staff’s observations, the pump has caused or threatens to cause a violation of the following WDR requirements: Discharge Prohibition A.2: “The by-pass or overflow of untreated or partially treated waste is prohibited.”		Violation	B	Complaint
1112187	01/09/2023	UAUTHDISC	On 9 January 2023 Board staff received an OES report (attached) filed by a third party stating that a pump was being used during the night to pump wastewater from the facility’s ponds into the creek. Board staff also received video evidence of the pump. Board staff performed a site inspection in response later that day. At the time of the inspection Board staff observed the pump located on the berm of the treatment ponds adjacent to the creek. The intake hose was in Pond 2 and the discharge hose was in Pond 1. However, there was evidence that the discharge hose had been laying on the grass between the pump and the creek, and cinder blocks to hold the end of the hose were in the creek bed consistent with the photos provided in the complaint (see attached photo log). The onsite managers stated that El Dorado County Environmental Health (County) had been to the Facility earlier that day. They said at that time the pump’s intake hose had been in Pond 2 and the discharge hose had been running down the side of the berm into the creek. The County had asked that the discharge hose be removed from the creek, and the onsite managers had complied. Based on the video evidence provided to Board staff, the onsite manager’s statement, and Board staff’s observations, the pump has caused or threatens to cause a violation of the following WDR requirements: Discharge Specification B.2: “The discharge shall not cause degradation of any water supply.”		Violation	B	Complaint
1112188	01/09/2023	UAUTHDISC	On 9 January 2023 Board staff received an OES report (attached) filed by a third party stating that a pump was being used during the night to pump wastewater from the facility’s ponds into the creek. Board staff also received video evidence of the pump. Board staff performed a site inspection in response later that day. At the time of the inspection Board staff observed the pump located on the berm of the treatment ponds adjacent to the creek. The intake hose was in Pond 2 and the discharge hose was in Pond 1. However, there was evidence that the discharge hose had been laying on the grass between the pump and the creek, and cinder blocks to hold the end of the hose were in the creek bed consistent with the photos provided in the complaint (see attached photo log). The onsite managers stated that El Dorado County Environmental Health (County) had been to the Facility earlier that day. They said at that time the pump’s intake hose had been in Pond 2 and the discharge hose had been running down the side of the berm into the creek. The County had asked that the discharge hose be removed from the creek, and the onsite managers had complied. Based on the video evidence provided to Board staff, the onsite manager’s statement, and Board staff’s observations, the pump has caused or threatens to cause a violation of the following WDR requirements: Discharge Specification B.3: “The discharge shall remain within the designated disposal area at all times.”		Violation	B	Complaint
1080443	10/20/2020	Deficient Reporting	Not included in AMR: ¿ Item B.7 of the MRP requires ¿A discussion of long range planning by the Discharger relative to expanding or abandoning the existing facility, community growth and wastewater flows versus facility capacity, and inflow/infiltration projections as a function of rainfall.¿		Violation	B	Report
1080445	10/20/2020	Deficient Reporting	¿ Effluent water samples are not being collected or reported at the required frequency. TDS, nitrate, and BOD, electrical conductivity, and total nitrogen are required to monitored monthly. TDS and chloride are also required to be sampled semi annually. However, it does not appear that an effluent sample has been collected since April of 2019. This is a violation of the WDRs.		Violation	B	Report
1080446	10/20/2020	Deficient Reporting	¿ Reported influent flows appear to possibly include errors. In several cases the exact same flow in gallons per day is reported for multiple months in a row. Also, some dry weather flows, such as July 2020, are over 40% higher than average wet weather flows.		Violation	B	Report
1080444	10/20/2020	Deficient Reporting	¿ Surface water samples are not being collected or reported at the required frequency. TDS, nitrate, and chloride are required to monitored monthly. However, only 3 surface water samples have been reported in the last 12 month. This is a violation of the WDRs.		Violation	B	Report
1080442	02/01/2020	Deficient Reporting	Not included in AMR: Item B.6 of the MRP requires ¿A discussion of any data gaps or potential deficiencies/redundancies in the monitoring system or reporting program.¿		Violation	B	Report
Report displays most recent five years of violations. Refer to the Interactive Violation Report for more data.

Total Violations: 9

Priority Violations: 0

*Click the "(+/-) Violation Description" link to expand and contract the violation description.
*As of 5/20/2010, the Water Board's Enforcement Policy requires that all violations be classified as 1, 2 or 3, with class 1 being the highest. Prior to this, violations were simply classified as Yes or No. If a 123 classification has been assigned to a violation that occurred before this date, that classification data will be displayed instead of the Yes/No data.

Violation Types
Deficient Reporting = Deficient Reporting	UAUTHDISC = Unauthorized Discharge

Enforcement Actions

Enf Id	Enf Type	Enf Order No.	Effective Date	Status
314727	Notice of Violation	null	11/07/2006	Historical
255935	Notice of Violation	null	04/21/2005	Historical
242923	Notice of Violation		07/30/2003	Historical

Total Enf Actions: 3

Inspections

Inspection ID	Inspection Type	Lead Inspector	Actual End Date	Planned	Violations	Attachment
51901836	B Type compliance inspection	Kenny Croyle	05/24/2023	N	0	Download
50166845	B Type compliance inspection	Kenny Croyle	01/09/2023	N	0	Download
41842730	B Type compliance inspection	Kenny Croyle	07/30/2020	N	0	N/A
40685478	B Type compliance inspection	Kenny Croyle	06/17/2020	N	0	N/A
20979446	B Type compliance inspection	Paul Sanders	06/25/2015	N	0	Download
10537963	B Type compliance inspection	Brendan Kenny	12/04/2012	N	0	N/A
9628189	B Type compliance inspection	Brendan Kenny	09/10/2012	N	0	N/A
2137722	B Type compliance inspection	Brendan Kenny	03/04/2010	N	0	N/A
711806	B Type compliance inspection	Brendan Kenny (Multiple)	03/24/2006	N	0	N/A
335727	Complaint inspection	Jim Martin	08/31/2004	Y	0	N/A
325770	Follow-up inspection (enforcement)	Nickolas Anderson	08/06/2002	Y	0	N/A
325788	Complaint inspection	George W Lockwood	07/26/2002	Y	0	N/A
325790	Complaint inspection	George W Lockwood	07/16/2002	Y	0	N/A
308509	Complaint inspection	George W Lockwood	05/17/2002	Y	0	N/A
325787	B Type compliance inspection	George W Lockwood	01/22/2002	Y	0	N/A
308508	B Type compliance inspection	George W Lockwood	10/11/2000	Y	0	N/A
308510	Follow-up inspection (noncompliance)	George W Lockwood	01/21/1999	Y	0	N/A
308512	B Type compliance inspection	Ethan Heilman	07/10/1998	Y	0	N/A
308511	Follow-up inspection (enforcement)	Bill Croyle	03/23/1998	Y	0	N/A

Total Inspections: 19

Last Inspection: 05/24/2023

The current report was generated with data as of: 05/31/2024
Regional Boards are in the process of entering backlogged data.
As a result, data may be incomplete.

Back to Main Page | Back to Top of Page