California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS 20.5)


	California Home

Welcome to California - images of Golden Gate Bridge, ocean sunset, waterfall, flowers, and city skyline


	California Integrated Water Quality System Project (CIWQS)

Facility At-A-Glance Report

[VIEW PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION] [EXPORT THIS REPORT TO EXCEL]

SEARCH CRITERIA: [REFINE SEARCH] [NEW SEARCH] [GLOSSARY]
Place ID 210036

General Information
Region	Place ID	Place Name	Place Type	Place Address	Place County
5F	210036	Still Water Ranch LLC	Animal Feeding	5001 4th Hanford, CA, 93230	Kings

Related Parties

Party	Party Type	Party Name	Role	Classification	Relationship Start Date	Relationship End Date
638690	Organization	Garret te Velde	Owner and Operator	Private-Individual	10/29/2024
545354	Person	Lewis Lummen	Case Worker		01/13/2016
370391	Person	Jorge Baca	Inspector		03/15/2010	12/31/2015
45362	Organization	Te Velde, David	Owner and Operator	Privately-Owned Business	06/29/2007	08/23/2024
137763	Organization	Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Fresno Office	Regulating	Waterboard	06/29/2007

Total Related Parties: 5

Regulatory Measures

Reg Measure ID	Reg Measure Type	Region	Program	Order No.	WDID	Effective Date	Expiration Date	Status	Amended?
164912	Unregulated	5F	ANIWSTCOWS		5D165069001			Historical	N
340893	Enrollee - WDR	5F	ANIWSTCOWS	R5-2013-0122	5D165069001	06/29/2007	10/02/2018	Active	N

Total Reg Measures: 2

Violations

Violation ID	Occurred Date	Violation Type	(-) Violation Description	Corrective Action	Status	Classification	Source
1085509	09/01/2020	Order Conditions	Well 18s had an inadequate air gap as required by Attachment B of the Reissued General Order.		Violation	B	Inspection
Report displays most recent five years of violations. Refer to the Interactive Violation Report for more data.

Total Violations: 1

Priority Violations: 0

*Click the "(+/-) Violation Description" link to expand and contract the violation description.
*As of 5/20/2010, the Water Board's Enforcement Policy requires that all violations be classified as 1, 2 or 3, with class 1 being the highest. Prior to this, violations were simply classified as Yes or No. If a 123 classification has been assigned to a violation that occurred before this date, that classification data will be displayed instead of the Yes/No data.

Violation Types
Order Conditions = Order Conditions

Enforcement Actions

Enf Id	Enf Type	Enf Order No.	Effective Date	Status
389728	Notice of Violation		03/28/2013	Historical
245036	Staff Enforcement Letter		02/04/2003	Historical
238741	Staff Enforcement Letter		12/03/2001	Historical
236598	Staff Enforcement Letter		06/28/2001	Historical
235327	Staff Enforcement Letter		06/07/2001	Historical

Total Enf Actions: 5

Inspections

Inspection ID	Inspection Type	Lead Inspector	Actual End Date	Planned	Violations	Attachment
41950405	B Type compliance inspection	Lewis Lummen	09/01/2020	N	1	N/A
24860735	B Type compliance inspection	Lewis Lummen	06/21/2016	N	6	N/A
10493462	B Type compliance inspection	Jorge Baca	09/28/2012	N	0	N/A
334272	Complaint inspection	Matt Scroggins	04/27/2004	Y	0	N/A

Total Inspections: 4

Last Inspection: 09/01/2020

The current report was generated with data as of: 05/16/2025
Regional Boards are in the process of entering backlogged data.
As a result, data may be incomplete.

Back to Main Page | Back to Top of Page