[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR
2008
Primary Owner:
LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
Statement Number:
S001725
Date Submitted:
06/15/2011
Water is used under |
Pre-1914 Claim
|
Year of first use |
1878
|
Month |
Rate of diversion
(CFS)
|
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount beneficially used
(Acre-Feet)
|
January |
0.28 |
17 |
17 |
February |
0.18 |
10 |
10 |
March |
0.08 |
5 |
5 |
April |
3.23 |
192 |
192 |
May |
2.73 |
168 |
168 |
June |
3.19 |
190 |
190 |
July |
3.12 |
192 |
192 |
August |
2.93 |
180 |
180 |
September |
1.65 |
98 |
98 |
October |
0.24 |
15 |
15 |
November |
0.24 |
14 |
14 |
December |
0.33 |
20 |
20 |
Total |
|
1101 |
1101 |
Purpose of Use
|
Irrigation |
182
Acres
|
Changes in Method of Diversion |
|
Conservation of Water |
Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
No
|
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated |
|
Reduction in Diversions |
|
Reduction in consumptive use |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due
to conservation efforts.
|
|
Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater
treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to
a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial
causes?
|
No
|
Amount of reduced diversion |
|
type of substitute water supply |
|
Amount of substitute water supply used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the
use of a substitute water supply
|
|
Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater |
Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?
|
No
|
amounts of groundwater used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to
the use of groundwater.
|
|
Attachments |
File Name |
Size |
No Attachments |
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
First Name |
Jennifer |
Last Name |
Wong |
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report
is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief
|
Yes
|