[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR
2012
Primary Owner:
WILLIAM L. HINMAN
Statement Number:
S021670
Date Submitted:
06/15/2013
1. Water is used under |
Riparian Claim
|
2. Year of first use |
1990
|
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and
Amount of Water Diverted and Used
|
Month |
Rate of diversion
(GPD)
|
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Gallons)
|
Amount beneficially used
(Gallons)
|
January |
0 |
0 |
0 |
February |
0 |
0 |
0 |
March |
0 |
0 |
0 |
April |
0 |
0 |
0 |
May |
288000 |
0.8838432 |
0.8838432 |
June |
840000 |
2.577876 |
2.577876 |
July |
892800 |
2.73991392 |
2.73991392 |
August |
892800 |
2.73991392 |
2.73991392 |
September |
840000 |
2.577876 |
2.577876 |
October |
288000 |
0.8838432 |
0.8838432 |
November |
0 |
0 |
0 |
December |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
|
12.40326624 |
12.40326624 |
Comments |
|
5. Water Diversion Measurement
|
a. |
Measurement |
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted
and/or diverted to storage
|
b. |
Types of measuring devices used |
|
c. |
Additional technology used |
|
Description of additional technology used |
|
d. |
Who installed your measuring device(s) |
|
e. |
Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s) |
|
f. |
Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective"
|
|
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in
Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"
|
I was not aware that a measuring device was mandatory. My fault, my ignorance.
Tenants added irrigated acreage and many more animals than in previous years.
|
g. |
Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
-
Electricity records dedicated to the pump
-
Power generation estimates
|
Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
In 2012 the tenant on this acreage elected to irrigate 7 days a week,adding 2 more acres. The electricity is dedicated to the pump (90 gal. min.for 320 min.day,7days a week for approx.142 days) was the only way water usage could be estimated after the fact.
|
6. Purpose of Use
|
Domestic |
half acre garden , 25 horses
|
Irrigation |
8
Acres
|
7. Changes in Method of Diversion |
In 2012, more water was diverted on this property,more animal units were grazed.
In In 2013,thus far there is no diversion to this acerage.
|
8. Conservation of Water |
a. |
Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated |
We are conserving water in 2013 by not diverting any to this acerage.
|
b. |
Amount of water conserved |
Acre-Feet
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due
to conservation efforts.
|
No
|
9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
a.
|
Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater
treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to
a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial
causes?
|
No
|
b. |
Amount of reduced diversion |
|
Type of substitute water supply |
|
Amount of substitute water supply used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the
use of a substitute water supply
|
|
10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater |
a. |
Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?
|
No
|
b. |
Amount of groundwater used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to
the use of groundwater.
|
|
Attachments |
File Name |
Description |
Size |
No Attachments |
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
First Name |
Maralee |
Last Name |
Hinman |
Relation to Water Right |
Owner |
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report
is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief
|
Yes
|