[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR
2012
Primary Owner:
LYONS INVESTMENT
Statement Number:
S017388
Date Submitted:
06/30/2013
| 1. Water is used under |
Riparian Claim
|
| 2. Year of first use |
1962
|
|
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and
Amount of Water Diverted and Used
|
| Month |
Rate of diversion
|
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount beneficially used
(Acre-Feet)
|
| January |
|
0 |
0 |
| February |
|
0 |
0 |
| March |
|
94.48 |
94.48 |
| April |
|
85.02 |
85.02 |
| May |
|
127.1 |
127.1 |
| June |
|
87.97 |
87.97 |
| July |
|
76.53 |
76.53 |
| August |
|
36.65 |
36.65 |
| September |
|
48.38 |
48.38 |
| October |
|
42.3 |
42.3 |
| November |
|
21.49 |
21.49 |
| December |
|
0 |
0 |
| Total |
|
619.92 |
619.92 |
| Comments |
|
|
5. Water Diversion Measurement
|
| a. |
Measurement |
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted
and/or diverted to storage
|
| b. |
Types of measuring devices used |
|
| c. |
Additional technology used |
|
| Description of additional technology used |
|
| d. |
Who installed your measuring device(s) |
|
| e. |
Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s) |
|
| f. |
Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective"
|
|
|
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in
Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"
|
We feel that using crop duty estimates, electricity records, and pumps flows are more that adequate to estimate our water diversion.
|
| g. |
Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
-
Crop duty estimates/consumptive use estimates
-
Electricity records dedicated to the pump
|
| Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
We used the crop duty estimates in combination with power records and pump flows to determine the acre feet of water diverted from the river. Don Pedro Pump has tested all of our pumps and given us a gallons per minute for each pump.
|
|
6. Purpose of Use
|
| Irrigation |
169
Acres
|
| 7. Changes in Method of Diversion |
|
no change
|
| 8. Conservation of Water |
| a. |
Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
| Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated |
Tail water return systems, CIMIS weather system, laser leveling, East San Joaquin Water Coalition member, and irrigation management practices
|
| b. |
Amount of water conserved |
Acre-Feet
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due
to conservation efforts.
|
|
| 9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
|
a.
|
Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater
treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to
a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial
causes?
|
No
|
| b. |
Amount of reduced diversion |
|
| Type of substitute water supply |
|
| Amount of substitute water supply used |
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the
use of a substitute water supply
|
|
| 10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater |
| a. |
Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?
|
No
|
| b. |
Amount of groundwater used |
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to
the use of groundwater.
|
|
| Attachments |
| File Name |
Description |
Size |
| No Attachments |
| Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
| First Name |
Stephen |
| Last Name |
Sheppard |
| Relation to Water Right |
Agent |
|
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report
is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief
|
Yes
|