Statement Number: S019619
Date Submitted: 2016-08-08
1. Water is used under Riparian Claim
Other: USBR Settlement Contract
2. Year diversion commenced 1924
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and Amount of Water Diverted and Used
Month Rate of diversion
Amount directly diverted
Amount diverted or
collected to storage
Amount beneficially used
January 3000 0 0 0
February 3000 0 0 0
March 3000 0 0 0
April 3000 0 0 0
May 3000 0 0 0
June 3000 0 0 0
July 3000 0 0 0
August 3000 0 0 0
September    3000 0 0 0
October 3000 0 0 0
November 3000 0 0 0
December 3000 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Type of Diversion Direct Diversion Only
Comments Low water levels on the Sacramento River combined with technical and mechanical problems with the pumping plant prevented diversions in 2010.
Water Transfers
8e. Water transfered No
8f. Quantity transfered (Acre-Feet)
8g. Dates which transfer occurred / to /
8h. Transfer approved by
Water Supply Contracts
8i. Water supply contract Yes
8j. Contract with USBR
8k. Other provider none
8l. Contract number 2401A
8m. Source from which contract water was diverted Sacramento River
8n. Point of diversion same as identified water right Yes
8o. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to divert under this contract 7122
8p. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to be diverted in 2010 7122
8q. Amount (Acre-Feet) projected for 2011 7122
8r. Exchange or settlement of prior rights Yes
8s. All monthly reported diversion claimed under the prior rights Yes
8t. Amount (Acre-Feet) of reported diversion solely under contract
5. Water Diversion Measurement
a. Measurement Water directly diverted and/or diverted to storage was measured
b. Types of measuring devices used
  • Propeller Meter
  • Other: hour meter
c. Additional technology used
Description of additional technology used
d. Who installed your measuring device(s)
  • Other/Unknown: USBR
e. Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s) unknown
f. Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective"
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"
g. Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement
Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement
6. Purpose of Use
No Use
7. Changes in Method of Diversion
8. Conservation of Water
a. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? Yes
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated Selected Conveyance ditches are concrete lined. We employ tail water recovery systems to reuse water on site. Any water leaving our property is reused by RD1004.
b. Amount of water conserved
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to conservation efforts.
9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation
a. Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial causes? No
b. Amount of reduced diversion
Type of substitute water supply
Amount of substitute water supply used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of a substitute water supply
10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater
a. Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water? No
b. Amount of groundwater used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of groundwater.
11a. Additional Remarks
Please see attached file. This diversion is 1 of 3 consolidated and reported under Carter Mutual Water Company (S013880).
File Name Description Size
Att 1-Statement of Water Diversion and Use.docx 58 KB
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form
First Name Ben
Last Name Carter
Relation to Water Right Other: Agent
The information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief Yes