[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR
2012
Primary Owner:
EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Statement Number:
S009035
Date Submitted:
2014-06-30
| 1. Water is used under |
Pre-1914 Claim
|
| 2. Year of first use |
1875
|
|
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and
Amount of Water Diverted and Used
|
| Month |
Rate of diversion
(CFS)
|
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount beneficially used
(Acre-Feet)
|
| January |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| February |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| March |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| April |
0 |
668 |
0 |
| May |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| June |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| July |
181.5 |
0 |
360 |
| August |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| September |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| October |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| November |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| December |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Total |
|
668 |
360 |
| Comments |
None |
|
5. Water Diversion Measurement
|
| a. |
Measurement |
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted
and/or diverted to storage
|
| b. |
Types of measuring devices used |
|
| c. |
Additional technology used |
|
| Description of additional technology used |
|
| d. |
Who installed your measuring device(s) |
|
| e. |
Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s) |
|
| f. |
Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective"
|
|
|
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in
Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"
|
Diversion is located in wilderness area
|
| g. |
Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
|
| Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
Staff gage
|
|
6. Purpose of Use
|
| Irrigation |
4100 Acres |
| Other |
Domestic (118,500 persons), Power Generation (21.0 MW), Industrial (light manufacturing), Fire Protection, Agricultural |
| 7. Changes in Method of Diversion |
|
None
|
| 8. Conservation of Water |
| a. |
Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
| Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated |
During the reporting period, the District implemented water conservation best management practices, including all urban measures reported in the District's Urban Water Management Plan 2010 Update, and all agricultural measures reported in the District's USBR Five-Year Water Management Plan Update.
Reduction/substitution volumes are District-wide and not attributable solely to this right.
|
| b. |
Amount of water conserved |
2661
Acre-Feet
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due
to conservation efforts.
|
Yes
|
| 9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
|
a.
|
Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater
treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to
a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial
causes?
|
Yes
|
| b. |
Amount of reduced diversion |
2853
Acre-Feet
|
| Type of substitute water supply |
Recycled
|
| Amount of substitute water supply used |
2853
Acre-Feet
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the
use of a substitute water supply
|
|
| 10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater |
| a. |
Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?
|
No
|
| b. |
Amount of groundwater used |
|
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to
the use of groundwater.
|
|
| 11a. Additional Remarks |
|
The priority date for this water right is 1856. The year of first use was 1875.
|
| Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
| First Name |
Brian |
| Last Name |
Mueller |
| Relation to Water Right |
Other: Agent |
|
The information in the report
is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief
|
Yes
|