[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
PROGRESS REPORT BY PERMITTEE FOR
2012
Primary Owner:
EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Primary Contact:
Brian
Mueller
Date Submitted:
2013-06-17
Application Number:
A007478
Permit Number:
004071
MAX Direct Diversion Rate:
0.25
CFS
MAX Collection to Storage:
0.0
AC-FT
Face Value:
104.0
AC-FT
| 1. Permit Review |
| I have reviewed my water right permit |
Yes
|
| 2. Compliance with Permit Terms and Conditions |
| I am complying with all terms and conditions |
Yes
|
| Description of noncompliance with terms and conditions |
|
| 3. Changes to the Project |
| Intake location has been changed |
|
| Description of intake location changes |
|
| Type of use has changed |
|
| Description of type of use changes |
|
| Place of use has changed |
|
| Description of place of use changes |
|
| Other changes |
|
| Description of other changes |
|
| 4-6. Permitted Project Status |
| Project Status |
Not Complete
|
| 6a. Construction work has commenced |
Yes
|
| 6b. Construction is completed |
Yes
|
| 6c. Beneficial uses of water has commenced |
Yes
|
| 6d. Project will be completed within the time period specified in the permit |
Yes
|
| 6e. Explanation of work remaining to be done |
Maximum beneficial use not yet achieved. |
| 6f. Estimated date of completion |
12/31/2020 |
|
7. Purpose of Use
|
| Fire Protection |
Outingdale WTP
|
| Irrigation |
90
Acres
Mixed Crop Types
|
| Industrial |
Light Manufacturing
|
| Municipal |
515
|
| 8. Amount of Water Diverted and Used |
| Month |
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount used
(Acre-Feet)
|
| January |
2.58 |
2.58 |
| February |
2.23 |
2.23 |
| March |
2.62 |
2.62 |
| April |
2.56 |
2.56 |
| May |
4.52 |
4.52 |
| June |
5.52 |
5.52 |
| July |
6.83 |
6.83 |
| August |
7.5 |
7.5 |
| September |
5.79 |
5.79 |
| October |
4.45 |
4.45 |
| November |
2.66 |
2.66 |
| December |
2.77 |
2.77 |
| Total |
50.03 |
50.03 |
| Comments |
|
| 9. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month |
| Month |
Maximum Rate of Diversion
(CFS)
|
| January |
0.25 |
| February |
0.25 |
| March |
0.25 |
| April |
0.25 |
| May |
0.25 |
| June |
0.25 |
| July |
0.25 |
| August |
0.25 |
| September |
0.25 |
| October |
0.25 |
| November |
0.25 |
| December |
0.25 |
| 10. Storage |
| Reservoir name |
Spilled this year |
Feet below spillway at maximum storage |
Completely emptied |
Feet below spillway at minimum storage |
Method used to measure water level |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Conservation of Water |
| 11. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
| Description of water conservation efforts |
The District is currently implementing water conservation best management practices, including all urban measures reported in our Urban Water Management Plan 2010 Update.
Reduction/substitution volumes are District-wide and not attributable solely to this right.
|
| 12. Amount of water conserved |
2661
Acre-Feet
|
| Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
|
13. During the period covered by this Report, did you use reclaimed water
from a wastewater treatment facility, water from a desalination facility,
or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects the
water for other beneficial uses?
|
Yes
|
| 14. Amount of reclaimed, desalinated, or polluted water used |
2853
Acre-Feet
|
| Conjuctive Use of Groundwater and Surface Water |
|
15. During the period covered by this Report, were you using groundwater
in lieu of available surface water authorized under your permit?
|
No
|
| 16. Amounts of groundwater used |
|
| Additional Remarks |
|
Due to slower than anticipated population growth, water demand has not increased as expected and is less than the permit's authorized amount. The District is exploring a project to provide an alternative water supply to this area. If it decides not to construct such a project, the District will seek a further time extension of the permit.
|
| Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
| First Name |
Brian |
| Last Name |
Mueller |
| Relation to Water Right |
Agent |
| Has read the form and agrees the information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief |
Yes
|