[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]

REPORT OF LICENSEE FOR 2011

Primary Owner: RRG GARDEN PROPERTIES LLC
Application Number: A011910
License Number: 004636
Date Submitted: 2012-04-17
1. Project Abandoned
The project has been abandoned and I request revocation of my water right license No
2. Compliance with License Terms and Conditions
I have currently reviewed my water right license and I am complying with all terms and conditions Yes
Description of noncompliance with terms and conditions
3. Changes to the Project
Intake location has been changed
Description of intake location changes
Type of use has changed
Description of type of use changes
Place of use has changed
Description of place of use changes
Other changes
Description of other changes
4. Purpose of Use
Irrigation 963 Acres Mixed Crop Types
5. Amount of Water Diverted and Used
Month Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
Amount used
(Acre-Feet)
January 0 0
February 0 0
March 0 0
April 119 119
May 119 119
June 0 0
July 119 119
August 119 119
September    0 0
October 0 0
November 0 0
December 0 0
Total 476 476
6. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month
Month Maximum Rate of Diversion
()
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September   
October
November
December
7. Storage
Reservoir name Spilled this year Feet below spillway at maximum storage Completely emptied Feet below spillway at minimum storage Method used to measure water level
           
Conservation of Water
8. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? Yes
Description of water conservation efforts Optimum water conservation efforts are ongoing and include, but are not limited to, good water management and farming practices such as, re-circulation system, crop shifts, varietal changes and laser leveling of fields. The total quantity of water conserved during each year is variable and depends upon numerous factors, including but not limited to climatic conditions, hydrologic conditions, and on-farm operational practices. Differentiating and measuring or quantifying conserved water for some efforts is not possible or feasible due to the complexity of the multiple variables involved. Therefore, the annual quantity of water conserved (8,978 acre-feet) is estimated based on the difference between the 29,800 acre-feet authorized for diversion under the Companys Contract with the Bureau of Reclamation, Settlement Contract No. 14-06-200-878A-R-1, and the 20,322 acre-feet diverted for beneficial use by River Garden Farms in 2011. This quantity includes conserved water under the Company¿s License Nos. 1718, 3123, and 4636 (Applications 575, 577, and 11910, respectively), riparian claims, and the Contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
9. Amount of water conserved 8978 Acre-Feet
Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation
10. During the period covered by this Report, did you use reclaimed water from a wastewater treatment facility, water from a desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects the water for other beneficial uses? No
11. Amount of reclaimed, desalinated, or polluted water used
Conjuctive Use of Groundwater and Surface Water
12. During the period covered by this Report, were you using groundwater in lieu of available surface water authorized under your license? No
13. Amounts of groundwater used
Additional Remarks
Purpose of Use: The acreage identified in this report receives water under River Garden Farms Companys water right Licenses Nos. 1718 (A575), 3123 (A 577), 4636 (A11910), and Settlement Contract No. 14-06-200-878A-R-1 between the Company and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The water under all the Companys rights is conveyed using the same facilities. Amount of Water Used: Monthly diversions for License 4636 are estimated by River Garden Farms based on pumping capacity and time of use.
Attachments
File Name Description Size
No Attachments
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form
First Name MBK Engineers
Last Name MBK Engineers
Relation to Water Right Other
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief Yes