[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
REPORT OF LICENSEE FOR
2010
Primary Owner:
BRETT
SCHEIDEL
Application Number:
A015606
License Number:
011001
Date Submitted:
2011-06-27
| Compliance with License Terms and Conditions |
| The project has been abandoned and I request revocation of my water right license |
No
|
| I have reviewed my water right license |
Yes
|
| I am complying with all terms and conditions |
Yes
|
| Description of noncompliance with terms and conditions |
|
| Intake location has been changed |
|
| Description of intake location changes |
|
| Type of use has changed |
|
| Description of type of use changes |
|
| Place of use has changed |
|
| Description of place of use changes |
|
|
Purpose of Use
|
| Irrigation |
1104
Acres
Mixed Crop Types
|
| Month |
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount used
(Acre-Feet)
|
| January |
0 |
0 |
| February |
0 |
0 |
| March |
0 |
0 |
| April |
0 |
0 |
| May |
1486 |
1486 |
| June |
1652 |
1652 |
| July |
1925 |
1925 |
| August |
1719 |
1719 |
| September |
336 |
336 |
| October |
0 |
0 |
| November |
0 |
0 |
| December |
0 |
0 |
| Total |
7118 |
7118 |
| Month |
Maximum Rate of Diversion
()
|
| January |
|
| February |
|
| March |
|
| April |
|
| May |
|
| June |
|
| July |
|
| August |
|
| September |
|
| October |
|
| November |
|
| December |
|
| Reservoir name |
Spilled this year |
Feet below spillway at maximum storage |
Completely emptied |
Feet below spillway at minimum storage |
Method used to measure water level |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Conservation of Water |
| Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
| Description of water conservation efforts |
Optimal water conservation efforts are ongoing and include, but are not limited to, good water management and farming practices such as re-circulation of tail water, laser land leveling, crop varietal changes, and crop shifts. The quantity of water conserved through these practices has not been determined. Therefore the amount of water conserved shown below is based on the total quantity authorized for diversion under Licenses 5463, 6389B, 11001, 11002, 6389C, and 5667 as discussed under Additional Remarks, the quantity of water put to beneficial use in 2010.
|
| Amount of water conserved |
4056
Acre-Feet
|
| Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
|
During the period covered by this Report, did you use reclaimed water
from a wastewater treatment facility, water from a desalination facility,
or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects the
water for other beneficial uses?
|
No
|
| Amount of reclaimed, desalinated, or polluted water used |
|
| Conjuctive Use of Groundwater and Surface Water |
|
During the period covered by this Report, were you using groundwater
in lieu of available surface water authorized under your license?
|
No
|
| Amounts of groundwater used |
|
| Additional Remarks |
|
Purpose of Use: The acreage shown is the total acreage irrigated under Licenses 5463, 6389B, 11001, and 11002. Water is diverted under Licenses 5463, 6389B, 11001, and 11002 of Scheidel et.al. and Licenses 6389C and 5667 of River Ranch Partnership at a single point of diversion. The places of use under these Licenses overlap to varying degrees or do not overlap at all. Licenses 11001 and 11002 contain terms that limit the combined total quantity that may be diverted each year under the six Licenses to 11,174 acre-feet. These lands also receive water under Contract 14-06-200-5520A-R-1 between the Pleasant Grove-Verona Mutual Water Company and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Due to the complexity of the overlapping places of use, the combined use limitation of the licenses, and the Contract, it is not possible at this time to separate the quantity of water measured at the point of diversion that is delivered under the individual licenses; therefore, the acreage, the quantities diverted, the quantities beneficially used, and the estimated amount conserved shown on this report are also shown on the reports for 2010 for Licenses 5463, 6389B, 11002, 6389C, and 5667. The Licensees believe the combined use limit imposed on the Licenses by the SWRCB and the Contract require diversions and use to be evaluated collectively; however, the Licensees will work to develop a methodology for reasonable separating water use under the individual Licenses for future reports.
|
| Attachments |
| File Name |
Size |
| No Attachments |
| Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
| First Name |
MBK Engineers |
| Last Name |
MBK Engineers |
| Relation to Water Right |
Agent |
| Has read the form and agrees the information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief |
Yes
|