[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
REPORT OF LICENSEE FOR
2012
Primary Owner:
RECLAMATION DISTRICT #108
Primary Contact:
RECLAMATION DISTRICT #108
Date Submitted:
2013-06-27
Application Number:
A011899
License Number:
007060
MAX Direct Diversion Rate:
75.0
CFS
MAX Collection to Storage:
0.0
AC-FT
Face Value:
27372.3
AC-FT
1. Project Abandoned |
The project has been abandoned and I request revocation of my water right license |
No
|
2. Compliance with License Terms and Conditions |
I have currently reviewed my water right license and I am
complying with all terms and conditions
|
Yes
|
Description of noncompliance with terms and conditions |
|
3. Changes to the Project |
Intake location has been changed |
|
Description of intake location changes |
|
Type of use has changed |
|
Description of type of use changes |
|
Place of use has changed |
|
Description of place of use changes |
|
Other changes |
|
Description of other changes |
|
4. Purpose of Use
|
Irrigation |
3000
Acres
Mixed Crop Types
|
5. Amount of Water Diverted and Used |
Month |
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount used
(Acre-Feet)
|
January |
0 |
0 |
February |
0 |
0 |
March |
0 |
0 |
April |
0 |
0 |
May |
0 |
0 |
June |
412 |
412 |
July |
0 |
0 |
August |
0 |
0 |
September |
0 |
0 |
October |
0 |
0 |
November |
0 |
0 |
December |
0 |
0 |
Total |
412 |
412 |
Comments |
|
6. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month |
Month |
Maximum Rate of Diversion
()
|
January |
|
February |
|
March |
|
April |
|
May |
|
June |
|
July |
|
August |
|
September |
|
October |
|
November |
|
December |
|
7. Storage |
Reservoir name |
Spilled this year |
Feet below spillway at maximum storage |
Completely emptied |
Feet below spillway at minimum storage |
Method used to measure water level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation of Water |
8. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
Description of water conservation efforts |
The lands served under this license also receive water under the Districts water rights to the Sacramento River. The District continues to maximize the beneficial use of water by implementing numerous water conservation efforts including, but not limited to an extensive recirculation system, automated canal control structures, variable frequency drives at several pumping plants, installation and operation of a Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System, irrigation scheduling techniques and technologies, water conservation programs for landowners, weed management programs, canal lining, pipeline installation, and educational tools for District staff and its landowners. In addition, the Districts landowners have implemented numerous individual water conservation efforts including, but not limited to land leveling, irrigation scheduling techniques and technologies, varietal changes, crop shifts, drainage improvements, reduced spill from rice fields, and minimum tillage techniques. Furthermore, the District and its landowners have participated in numerous water transfers involving crop idling and shifting, which have resulted in reduced diversions. The total quantity of water conserved during each year is variable and depends upon numerous factors, including but not limited to climatic conditions, hydrologic conditions, District operational practices, and on-farm operational practices. Quantifying the water conserved through some efforts is difficult, and in some cases not possible or feasible due to the complexity of the multiple variables involved. Collectively these measures reduced the Districts need to divert water from the Colusa Drain in 2012. Therefore, the District has claimed credit for conservation based on its 1999 diversions under License 7060, based on the data currently available, was the year of maximum diversion under the License since Water Code Section 1011 was enacted in 1979.
|
9. Amount of water conserved |
15529
Acre-Feet
|
Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
10. During the period covered by this Report, did you use reclaimed water
from a wastewater treatment facility, water from a desalination facility,
or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects the
water for other beneficial uses?
|
No
|
11. Amount of reclaimed, desalinated, or polluted water used |
|
Conjuctive Use of Groundwater and Surface Water |
12. During the period covered by this Report, were you using groundwater
in lieu of available surface water authorized under your license?
|
No
|
13. Amounts of groundwater used |
|
Additional Remarks |
The acreage identified in this Report receives water under the Districts water right Licenses 3065, 3066, and 3067 (Applications 576, 763, and 1589, respectively).
|
Attachments |
File Name |
Description |
Size |
No Attachments |
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
First Name |
MBK Engineers |
Last Name |
MBK Engineers |
Relation to Water Right |
Other |
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief |
Yes
|