ࡱ> 7 -EbjbjUU V7|7|;l lnnn~$t"t"t"P","TfT2P$`$v$v$v$ & & &KKKKNgK"O"S$U WSQ & & & & &S+v$v$ T+++ &fv$v$K+ &K+(+3sB||^Cv$D$ `-vt"s'BC,6T0fTCXy(RXC+CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD  ADVANCE \d 5 INSPECTION REPORT 17 July 2002 DISCHARGER: City of Auburn LOCATION & COUNTY: Auburn Wastewater Treatment Plant, Auburn, Placer County CONTACT(S): James KingProject Manager OMI, Inc./Auburn, Thomas FossumPublic Works Director/City Engineer INSPECTION DATE: 20 June 2002 INSPECTED BY: Melissa Hall, WRCE ACCOMPANIED BY: James King (Auburn WWTP Plant Operator), Susan Kelly and Trinh Pham (Regional Board staff) INTRODUCTION: The City of Auburn owns the Auburn Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is operated by Operations Management International, Incorporated (OMI). The treatment system at this plant consists of treatment and equalization ponds, an oxidation ditch, secondary clarification, coagulation and flocculation, filtration, disinfection, and removal of disinfectant. Treated wastewater is discharged into Auburn Ravine, a tributary to the Sacramento River. Sludge is dewatered with a belt filter press and removed to the Lincoln Landfill. An inspection of this facility was conducted to determine compliance with Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs), Order No. 98-189 (NPDES No. CA0077712), and with the State of California General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (industrial stormwater permit), Order No. 97-03-DWQ (WDID# 5S31S002989). The inspection included a tour of the facilities; a review of the treatment processes; sampling for influent, effluent, and receiving water constituents and parameters as required by Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-189; review of discharger self-monitoring reports (DSMRs) submitted for the months of June 2001 through May 2002; and review of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS: Regional Board staff last inspected the Auburn WWTP on 12 June 2001. The plant appeared to be clean, well-maintained, and in good operating condition. The weather was hot and clear. The influent flow rate at the time of inspection was 1.179 mgd at 9:00 a.m. The mechanically cleaned bar screen was in service at the time of the inspection; the manually cleaned bar screen was not being used at the time. Mr. King noted that the influent flow structure is capable of handling up to 18 mgd (million gallons per day). Wastewater was being treated in the aerated pond on the day of the inspection. Pond aeration is provided by surface aerators. The first baffled section of the aerated pond has nine aerators, four of which were in use during the inspection. The second, third, and fourth (final) baffled sections of the aerated pond each have one surface aerator, all of which were in use. Flows were being directed to the oxidation ditch. Following biological treatment in the oxidation ditch, flows are directed to one of two secondary clarifiers. Mr. King mentioned that the weirs of the secondary clarifiers can be chlorinated to minimize algal growth. Secondary effluent appeared to be of good quality. After clarification, wastewater is flash-mixed with poly aluminum chloride prior to flowing through a small mixing chamber and through one of seven continuous backwash sand filter cells. After filtration, the treated wastewater was directed to one of two chlorine contact chambers, where it received approximately 90 minutes of contact time with the disinfection agent. A 12.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite is being used for disinfection, and calcium thiosulfate is being used for dechlorination. Use of calcium thiosulfate means chemical adjustment of pH is unnecessary. A silicone-based, food-grade defoaming agent is also added. Receiving water monitoring points upstream and downstream of the plant appeared to be healthy, with low turbidity and temperatures and high concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Stormwater This inspection included a cursory review of compliance with the general industrial stormwater permit. No non-stormwater discharges other than those permitted by the individual NPDES permit were observed. The SWPPP was available for review at the time of the inspection, in accordance with Section A.2 of the general industrial stormwater permit, and appeared to be complete. Sampling Sampling of the treatment plant influent, effluent, and receiving waters was conducted during the inspection. Constituents and parameters for which sampling was conducted include the following: Influent 5-day, 20C biochemical oxygen demand (BOD); total suspended solids (TSS); flow Effluent BOD, TSS, settleable solids (SS), total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, temperature, ammonia, turbidity, total coliform organisms, chlorine residual, standard minerals, oil and grease, and MBAS R-1 and R-2 dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, fecal coliform organisms, turbidity, chlorine residual R-1: 50 feet upstream from the point of discharge R-2: 100 feet downstream from the point of discharge Tests for pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and chlorine residual were performed on-site by Board staff using portable meters. Flows were read from meters at the treatment plant. Bacterial analyses were performed by Sierra Foothill Laboratory in Jackson. Analyses for the remaining constituents are being/were performed by Twining Laboratories, Inc. in Fresno. All samples were grab samples. Laboratory Audit The laboratory at the treatment plant is currently certified by the California Department of Health Services Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) for the following analyses: Coliform organisms (multiple tube method)BODTSSAquatic toxicity bioassay with rainbow troutAmmoniaTDSTotal chlorine residualTurbiditySSSpecific conductivity The certification number for the laboratory is 2038. Certification was renewed 1 December 2000 and expires 31 December 2002. The laboratory audit included a comparison of a recent DSMR (March 2002) to laboratory records. The comparison revealed that the laboratory has been conducting duplicate analyses for various constituents for quality assurance/quality control. The results of these analyses, with the exception of coliform and ammonia, have not been shown in the DSMRs. The third paragraph of the Reporting section in Monitoring and Reporting Program No.98189 reads as follows: If the Discharger monitors any pollutant at the locations designated herein more frequently than is required by this Order, the results of such monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the values required in the discharge monitoring report form. Such increased frequency shall be indicated on the discharge monitoring report form. Future DSMRs must be modified to include these results. Results of Sampling Analyses Results from the laboratory analyses have been received. Portable meter and analytical laboratory results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In addition, the plant meter for effluent turbidity read 0.775 NTU at 10:30 a.m. and the plant meter for effluent calcium thiosulfate residual read 2.09 mg/l at 10:24 a.m. on the day of the inspection. All meter/kit results for the effluent were within permit limitations, with the exception of chlorine residual. The colorimeter analysis yielded a result of 0.24 mg/l of total chlorine (meter is accurate to 0.1 mg/l). As on the previous inspection, the detectable chlorine result is believed to have been caused by a reaction between the colorimeter DPD reagent and the antifoamant. Table 1Sampling Results InfluentEffluentR-1R-2BlankBOD (mg/l)200<5------TSS (mg/l)210------Settleable Solids (ml/lhr)--<0.1------Ammonia as N (mg/l)--<1.0------Turbidity--0.850.650.62--Temperature (F, C)--75.7, 24.358.5, 14.759.2, 15.1--Dissolved oxygen (mg/l)--8.611.7611.28-- (% saturation)----116112.2--pH--7.337.57.45--Chlorine (mg/l)--0.2<0.1<0.1--Total coliform organisms (MPN/100 ml)--22 and 250080<2Fecal coliform organisms (MPN/100 ml)----5030-- Table 2Pesticides and Standard Minerals (Effluent Only) Aldrin (mg/l) <0.5Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 270alpha BHC (mg/l) <0.5Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) 410beta BHC (mg/l) <0.5Ammonia as N (mg/l) <1.0delta BHC (mg/l) <0.5Chloride (mg/l)44gamma BHC (Lindane) (mg/l) <0.5Sulfate (mg/l)24Chlordane (mg/l)<5Nitrate as NO3 (mg/l)48p,p-DDD (mg/l) <0.5Bicarbonate (mg/l)48p,p-EEE (mg/l) <0.5Carbonate (mg/l)<1p,p-DDT (mg/l) <0.5Calcium (mg/l)17Dieldrin (mg/l) <0.5Magnesium (mg/l) 4.8Endrin (mg/l) <0.5Potassium (mg/l)15Endrin Aldehyde (mg/l) <0.5Sodium (mg/l)54Endosulfan I (mg/l) <0.5Hardness (mg/l) 7.2Endosulfan II (mg/l) <0.5Silica (mg/l)62Endosulfan Sulfate (mg/l) <0.5Boron (mg/l)15Heptachlor (mg/l) <0.5Iron (mg/l) 0.21Heptachlor Epoxide (mg/l) <0.5Ammonia as N (mg/l)<1Methoxychlor (mg/l) <0.5Phosphorous (mg/l) 2.0Polychlorinated Biphenyl (mg/l)<1Alkalinity (mg/l)40Toxaphene (mg/l)<5 Review of Discharger Self-Monitoring Reports A review of the monthly DSMRs for the months of June 2001 through May 2002 was conducted for this inspection. The following violations, report deficiencies, and areas of concern were noted: The last line of the Receiving Water Monitoring section of Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-189 reads as follows: Notes on receiving water conditions shall be summarized in the monitoring report. The DSMRs reviewed contained only a statement that observations had been made and that the effluent discharged had no adverse effect on the condition of the stream. A summary of receiving water condition notes does need to be included in the DSMR. Monitoring is conducted in order to determine compliance. Compliance cannot be determined without knowing the detection levels for all analyses for which the results are either non-detect or zero. The detection levels for the effluent chlorine, MBAS, and oil and grease analyses were missing from various reports. Specifically, the August 2001 DSMR was missing detection levels for effluent chlorine and MBAS and the September, October, November, and December 2001 and January, February, March, April, and May 2002 DSMRs were missing detection levels for effluent chlorine and oil and grease. Unionized ammonia results have frequently been reported as 0.0000. As reported by the Discharger in the April 2002 DSMR and a separate written report, the Auburn WWTP effluent exceeded the hourly average effluent chlorine residual limitation of 0.02 mg/l on 30 April 2002. According to the report, on-call plant operations staff responded to notification of a plant alarm late in the afternoon. Operations staff discovered that the dechlorination pump had stopped, started and placed the pump under manual operation, discovered that the pump failure was caused by a disattached sample line, and quickly reattached the line. The detectable chlorine event lasted approximately 50 minutes and the peak concentration was 0.8 mg/l. The average chlorine concentration for the hour in which the excursion occurred was 0.03 mg/l. Discharger operations staff purchased a new chart recorder for the dechlorination analyzer. The chart recorder was described as being equipped with alarm outputs that will enable operators to be alerted when the dechlorination residual is low, not just when chlorine is present in the effluent. Chlorine is listed as a Group II pollutant in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Since the hourly average effluent chlorine residual concentration listed above exceeded the hourly average effluent chlorine residual limitation of 0.02 mg/l by more than 20 percent, this violation is considered serious [California Water Code Section 13385(h)(2)(A)]. The Dischargers operations staff responded promptly and appropriately. As reported by the Discharger in the May 2002 DSMR and a separate written report, the Auburn WWTP effluent failed to meet the minimum survival requirement of 70% in the acute toxicity bioassay that started 17 May 2002. Discharger operations staff believe the toxicity was due to elevated ammonia concentrations caused by rapid weather and temperature changes resulting in reduced dissolved oxygen concentrations and reduced nitrification. Discharger operations staff placed the second aerator brush back on line and increased the frequency of ammonia monitoring from twice per week to three times per week. The oxidation ditch temperature monitoring frequency has also been increased from mornings only to mornings and afternoons to aid in identification and prevention of possible future ammonia-caused toxicity. Chronic toxicity test results for effluent samples collected 14 through 21 August 2001 (3rdQuarter 2001) reported significant reduction in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) survival in 6.25% effluent and 100% receiving water; significant reduction in fathead minnow weight in 12.5% effluent, 6.25% effluent, and 100% receiving water; significant reduction in Ceriodaphnia dubia survival in 100% effluent (0%); and significant reduction in Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction in 25% effluent, 12.5% effluent, 6.25% effluent, and 100% receiving water . Chronic toxicity test results for effluent samples collected 6 through 13 November 2001 (4thQuarter 2001) reported significant reduction in Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction in 100% effluent. Chronic toxicity test results for effluent samples collected 12 through 19 February 2002 (1stQuarter 2002) reported significant reduction in Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction in 100% effluent, 6.25% effluent and 100% receiving water. Chronic toxicity test results for effluent samples collected 14 through 21 May 2002 (2nd Quarter 2002) reported significant reduction in fathead minnow survival and weight in 100% effluent, Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction in 100% and 75% effluent, and Selenastrum capricornutum (algae) in 100% and 75% effluent. SUMMARY: A SWPPP was readily available for review by Regional Board staff at the facility. The SWPPP appeared to be complete and facility employees are trained for stormwater. This facility appears to be in compliance with the general industrial stormwater permit. The report deficiencies mentioned above are minor and were discussed during the inspection. Mr. King indicated that they would be promptly corrected. The issue of notes on receiving water observations was discussed and it was agreed that Regional Board staff would send operations staff examples from other dischargers. The toxicity trend noted in the previous inspection reports has continued through the period reviewed for this report. In order to make the most efficient use of resources and to aid in determination of the constituent(s) contributing to the observed toxicity, Regional Board staff recommend requesting the Discharger to conduct the routine toxicity testing required by Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-189 concurrently with the pollutant scan required by the 10 September 2001 California Water Code Section 13267 letter. _____________________________________ Melissa Hall Water Resources Control Engineer  Analysis not conducted by laboratory.  Result from Regional Board hand-held meter. Laboratory result from standard minerals analyses was 7.2. City of auburn -  PAGE 6 - Wastewater Treatment Plant placer County Inspection Report Approved: 45CDUXYfgrs ;<LMYZghz{W    WXl m I!J!c!d!!!!¼ 6CJ]CJ 56\]6]>*CJ>*\]CJ mHnHu5CJOJQJCJ 5OJQJj5OJQJUJ4VWXYfg <Z{@ d8^@ @ ^@ ` @ d8^@ `d$da$$a$:$!@ &$d!%d!&d!'d!+DY-D/M N!O!P!Q!a$DD#E,E   WXz @ ^@ ` ^`dd  !d d dh  !dOP|W$$IflFd0!6    4 la & F$If & F$Ifdd^^7AD & F$IfY$$IflOFd0!6    4 la & F$IfDE[\]^_OPd{u !d8^8h^h^ $If^ & F$IfW$$IflFd0!6    4 la PmnI!J!c!d!e!n!w!{!!! $d$Ifa$ d$Ifd `^`` d^d^!!!!!Dp6** $d$Ifa$  !d$If$$IfTl4ֈq"% #t0Q&4 la!!!!!9l$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!""0"1"m"n"""""""""""####@#A#Y#Z#}#~#####$$$$ $$R$T$$$$$$$$$%%% %%%@%B%F%V%n%p%t%v%z%%%%%%%%>*6]OJQJ 56\]6CJj0JCJU 6CJ]CJ *CJS!!!!!!! $d$Ifa$  !d$If!!!!!E7++ $d$Ifa$  !d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la!!!!!9$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$!!"" " "" $d$Ifa$  !d$If""""#"E7++ $d$Ifa$  !d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la#"("-"0"1"9$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$1"F"I"T"_"j"m" $d$Ifa$  !d$Ifm"n""""E7++ $d$Ifa$  !d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la"""""9$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$""""""" $d$Ifa$  !d$If""""""Ed<000 $d$Ifa$ d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la""""# #90 d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$ ######9$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$#C#F#O#S#V#Y# $d$Ifa$ d$IfY#Z#####E<000 $d$Ifa$ d$If$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la######900d^$$IfTlֈq"% #t0Q&4 la $d$Ifa$### $$X$h$j$D$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$Ifd^j$$$$$$%%D$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la d$If$$If^`a$  !d$If%F%V%X%z%%%%%MM$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$If%%%%%&&&&6&8&<&>&B&H&b&d&n&p&t&z&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&'"'$'('.'B'D'H'J'N'^'v'x'|''''''''''''''((((2(4(8(>(b(d(h(j(n(~(((((((((((((( ),).)2)4)8)H)H*OJQJ>*6]`%%%&& &B&H&t&M$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$Ift&z&|&&&&&&&[MM[M  !d$If$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$&'('.'0'N'^'|''M$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la  !d$If$$If^`a$'''''''((l^M^Ml^M$$If^`a$  !d$If$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la(8(>(@(n(~((((MM$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$If(((( ))8)H)d)M$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$IfH)^)`)d)j))))))))))))))))****6*`*b*f*h*l*|***********++ ++R+T+X+Z+^+d+++++++++++++1133&4'4R6S666::::;;;<<<< =====q>s>>>?0?6H*\OJQJ>*6]^d)j)l)))))))[MM[M  !d$If$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$)**6*8*l*|***M$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la  !d$If$$If^`a$**** +++^+d+l^M^Ml^M$$If^`a$  !d$If$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 lad++++++++M\?$If^`$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 la$$If^`a$  !d$If+++ ,,,,G-H-ljjdb\Ob & F >^ !^$$IfTl\4"1'   0!64 laH---..217B:l</=>U?V?_?`?d@e@AACCCC  !d !d^ & F >^^d^0?V?`?d@e@DDDIDJDDDDDDDDDE,E-E0J;mHnHu0J;j0J;U j0JU; *5CJOJQJ\^JCCCDIDDDDDDEEEEEE $@U;&/If  !`'d $ !da$E E!E"E#E$E%E&E'E(E)E*E+E,E~~~~~~~~~~~|$$IflF T0    4 la ,E-E $ !da$) 0 00"P/ =!"#k$8%) 0 00"P/ =!"#k$8% iD@D Normal5$7$8$9DH$CJ_HmH sH tH 6@6 Heading 1$d@&>*>@> Heading 2$d@&^>*F@F Heading 3$d@&^ 56\]2@2 Heading 4$@&6]H@H Heading 5 $ `@&^``>*<A@< Default Paragraph FontDOD Headline Cntr$a$5CJ$OJQJ, @, Footer  !,@, Header  !&)@!& Page Number4>@24 Title$a$5CJOJQJJC@BJ Body Text Indentp`d^p``4"@4 Caption xx 5CJ\LR@bL Body Text Indent 2d^6]FS@rF Body Text Indent 3 8^86]2@2 Footnote TextCJ8&@8 Footnote ReferenceH*=+= = +4VWXYfg <Z{    WXzOP7ADE[\]^_OPmnIJcdenw{  #(-01FIT_jmn CFOSVYZ   " B J K [ c w  !!!!!)!#F#Y#b#c##############$$%%n%o%h&i&).2@455)7*737478898}9~9;;;;;;;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0000000000000@0P0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P@0P0P`0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P@0P@0P@0P0P0P0P@0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0PH0PH0P0#0#0# 0#0#0#0#0#0# 0# 0# 0# 0# 0# 0# 0#0#0#0#0#0#0000#0#0#0#0#0@0@0 0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 000000000\\\\kkkkkkkn!%H)0?-E'1ELSDP!!!!!!"#"1"m""""" ##Y###j$%%t&&'((d))*d++H-CE,E-E(*+,-./023456789:;<=>?@ABCDFGHIJKMNOPQRTUV,E)4C=Tn!Ob$jT4AM1#ylb$خL2ș5vzb$_KX}|Dr7 b$AXR"qӀ) @0(  B S  ?=] i .7 s~:E !!@!C!l!o!!!!!!!!"%"/"["e""""#*#6###o(t(22226667;<<<=pl o Xh  K O !!@!A!l!m!**//2<4~4455::;<<<=33333333333333333334DZ[$(     " B F I I [ c w z !!!!)!O!W!{!!!!!!!! ""9"A"Q"V"p"x""""""""" ##>#E#Y#^#####Z&f&+,-22m222h3333;4>45\5o55(7*7*79898|9;;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<= Melissa Hall7H:\NPDES\RPM\Auburn WWTP\Auburn 06202002 Inspection.doc Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asd Melissa Hall^C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Auburn 06202002 Inspection.asdH!jR1:jR)Aj AhtVstjR?xV h(^h`(OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(()^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L. h(^h`(OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( h(^h`(OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo()Ast1:H!ht?x^         {ҙ        βL                h4                Y 7ADE[\]^cdenw{  #(-01FIT_jmn CFOSVYZ   " B J K [ c w  !!!!!)!#F#Y#b#c############<<<<<<<<<<<=@Casper\\Swrcb\.Casper_Q.rb5s.rb5.swrcbHPBFDB1HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6Casper?XX",HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6.\ ƣQp1 Pf0BT H|F+!@8(d9Gx*\.$Љ@l N itf7e1dz]5!t8e*VS NeЩ*k%,iV0j=1XyQ(#1ŰsO,H9 t(V9!!rGgR+)FG#gS=fl -`b-V5cW5rM_do}bt*#Fd~U0s'/4Dv~4D F{!|oQT|_ >`4Qm/ڦ=vU~ ]UTeśA pA  ؑ~  aF-XE0y]j ^$e\T"UҀՁ)^mPm2 hN`4Qm/ڦ=vU~ ]UTeśA pA  ؑ~  aF-XE0y]j ^$e\T"UҀՁ)^mPm2 hN?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F-1TableXXWordDocumentVSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjjObjectPool--  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q