[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR 2013

Primary Owner: M.J.M. Partnership
Statement Number: S018642

1. Water is used under	Riparian Claim Pre-1914 Claim
2. Year diversion commenced	1970

3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and Amount of Water Diverted and Used
Month	Rate of diversion (CFS)	Amount directly diverted (Acre-Feet)	Amount diverted or collected to storage (Acre-Feet)	Amount beneficially used (Acre-Feet)
January	0	0	0	0
February	0	0	0	0
March	0	0	0	0
April	0	0	0	0
May	0	0	0	0
June	0	0	0	0
July	0	0	0	0
August	0	0	0	0
September	0	0	0	0
October	0	0	0	0
November	0	0	0	0
December	0	0	0	0
Total		0	0	0
Type of Diversion	Direct Diversion Only
Comments	Source dry during irrigation season. No rain!!!!

Water Transfers
8e. Water transfered	No
8f. Quantity transfered (Acre-Feet)
8g. Dates which transfer occurred	/ to /
8h. Transfer approved by

Water Supply Contracts
8i. Water supply contract	Yes
8j. Contract with	Other: OAWD
8k. Other provider	Orland Artois Water District
8l. Contract number	1
8m. Source from which contract water was diverted	Shata lake
8n. Point of diversion same as identified water right	No
8o. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to divert under this contract	500
8p. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to be diverted in 2013	500
8q. Amount (Acre-Feet) projected for 2014	500
8r. Exchange or settlement of prior rights	No
8s. All monthly reported diversion claimed under the prior rights
8t. Amount (Acre-Feet) of reported diversion solely under contract	500

5. Water Diversion Measurement
a.	Measurement	Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted and/or diverted to storage
b.	Types of measuring devices used
c.	Additional technology used
	Description of additional technology used
d.	Who installed your measuring device(s)
e.	Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s)
f.	Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective"	Diversion is small or minimal in size Diversions are infrequent No power at diversion point
	Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"	No rain, no water!!!
g.	Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement	Modeled/estimated flows
	Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement	No water easy to measure

6. Purpose of Use
Irrigation	350 Acres Rice
Frost Protection	50 Acres

7. Changes in Method of Diversion

8. Conservation of Water
a.	Are you now employing water conservation efforts?	No
	Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated
b.	Amount of water conserved	Acre-Feet
	I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to conservation efforts.

9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation
a.	Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial causes?	No
b.	Amount of reduced diversion
	Type of substitute water supply
	Amount of substitute water supply used
	I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of a substitute water supply

10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater
a.	Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?	No
b.	Amount of groundwater used
	I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of groundwater.

11a. Additional Remarks

Attachments
File Name	Description	Size
No Attachments

Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form
First Name	Richard
Last Name	Jennings
Relation to Water Right	Diverter of Record
The information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief	Yes