[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR
2011
Primary Owner:
Phyllis Brooks
Statement Number:
S020010
Date Submitted:
05/29/2013
1. Water is used under |
Riparian Claim
Pre-1914 Claim
Other:
overlying and statutory rights
|
2. Year of first use |
1800
|
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and
Amount of Water Diverted and Used
|
Month |
Rate of diversion
|
Amount directly diverted or
collected to storage
(Acre-Feet)
|
Amount beneficially used
(Acre-Feet)
|
January |
|
10.34 |
6.46 |
February |
|
36.85 |
23.03 |
March |
|
50.76 |
312.73 |
April |
|
67.3 |
42.07 |
May |
|
96.01 |
30.63 |
June |
|
69.31 |
13.94 |
July |
|
97.51 |
31.57 |
August |
|
128.09 |
50.68 |
September |
|
119.57 |
45.36 |
October |
|
65.3 |
11.44 |
November |
|
17.65 |
11.03 |
December |
|
20.89 |
13.05 |
Total |
|
779.58 |
591.99 |
Comments |
|
5. Water Diversion Measurement
|
a. |
Measurement |
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted
and/or diverted to storage
|
b. |
Types of measuring devices used |
|
c. |
Additional technology used |
|
Description of additional technology used |
|
d. |
Who installed your measuring device(s) |
|
e. |
Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s) |
|
f. |
Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is
"not locally cost effective"
|
|
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in
Section 1 are "not locally cost effective"
|
The cost of acquisition, installation, maintenance (including vandalism and theft
deterrence and remediation), collection and compilation of data from measuring devices
is not locally cost-effective because the value of the local benefits of installing and
maintaining meters is not greater than the value of the local cost of implementing that
measure. There are no apparent grants available to otherwise cover costs of water meters
and related actions. Moreover, the unique hydrogeological characteristics of the Delta
(e.g., tides, seepage, interconnected channels, etc.) indicate that meters are not the best
available technology in this region. Any water diverted in the Delta which is not
consumed or evaporated is recycled to the Delta Pool for reuse. As further support for
the conclusion that measuring devices are not locally cost-effective reference is made to
the documentation on file with the SWRCB attesting to the lack of such cost-effectiveness submitted in connection with the SWRCB's July 21, 2011 "Water
Measurement Workshop" and the SWRCB¿s follow-up solicitation of comments (due
November 18, 2011) re the same.
|
g. |
Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
-
Crop duty estimates/consumptive use estimates
|
Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement |
Used ITRC REPORT 03-001 ETc Table for Irrigation Scheduling and Design, Zone 12
for Surface Irrigation, Typical year adjusted for the reporting year using CIMIS monthly
ETo for Manteca. For crops not covered by the ITRC report ETc was determined using
ratios to alfalfa from Table A-5, DWR Bulletin 168, October 1978.
|
6. Purpose of Use
|
Irrigation |
94
Acres
|
7. Changes in Method of Diversion |
|
8. Conservation of Water |
a. |
Are you now employing water conservation efforts? |
Yes
|
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated |
Good water management and farming practices, lined ditches, pipelines, drip irrigation,
sprinkler irrigation, low energy spray irrigation, cover crops, mulching, laser leveling.
Any diverted water which is not consumed or evaporated is recycled to the Delta Pool.
Credit is claimed for these water conservation efforts under section 1011 of the Water
Code. A specific amount conserved is not reported due to the lack of a present method to
precisely quantify that amount.
|
b. |
Amount of water conserved |
Acre-Feet
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due
to conservation efforts.
|
|
9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation |
a.
|
Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater
treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to
a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial
causes?
|
|
b. |
Amount of reduced diversion |
|
Type of substitute water supply |
|
Amount of substitute water supply used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the
use of a substitute water supply
|
|
10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater |
a. |
Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water?
|
No
|
b. |
Amount of groundwater used |
|
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to
the use of groundwater.
|
|
11a. Additional Remarks |
The amount diverted is a multiple of the reported use amount, plus a factor to account for
field flooding (if any). The multiple is to account for additional water that is diverted but
not consumed or evaporated.
|
Attachments |
File Name |
Description |
Size |
No Attachments |
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form |
First Name |
Rodney |
Last Name |
Roorda |
Relation to Water Right |
Agent |
Has read the form and agrees the information in the report
is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief
|
Yes
|